The operating problem
A research answer is only as useful as the path back to its evidence. Search snippets, stale summaries and uncited synthesis create confident documents that cannot survive review. Deep research needs current pages, internal context, explicit source handling and a workflow that separates collection from interpretation.
Research becomes a reproducible process with sources, tool traces and a clear boundary between evidence and synthesis.
A practical workflow
IaGenify connects model sessions, the live web, files, databases, terminals, media tools and platform services in one execution. A successful run can become a durable workflow that branches, pauses, retries and resumes.
- 01Define the decision, scope, freshness requirement and evidence standard before searching.
- 02Search the live web, open the relevant pages and preserve the URLs behind material facts.
- 03Read permitted internal files or data and keep them distinct from public evidence.
- 04Compare sources, expose disagreements and identify gaps instead of smoothing them away.
- 05Produce a structured brief with findings, limitations and a source trail a reviewer can inspect.
What IaGenify connects
One workspace for the work, one permission model for the consequences, and one execution trail for the result.
What success looks like
- Claims that can be traced to the page behind them
- Current evidence combined with internal context
- Visible uncertainty and source disagreement
- A repeatable research method rather than an opaque answer
Control stays visible
Every run keeps its tools, steps and cost visible. Plan mode is read-only, budgets stop open-ended work, and irreversible actions remain behind explicit approval.
Frequently asked questions
Does the agent rely on search snippets?
No. A research workflow can open and read source pages, then keep their URLs with the findings.
Can private documents be included?
Yes, within the file or storage boundaries explicitly provided to the run.
How does it handle conflicting sources?
The workflow can retain disagreement, compare authority and recency, and flag the issue for review.
Can the output follow a fixed format?
Yes. Structured outputs and reusable skills can enforce the sections and evidence fields your team needs.